New York Times · 10 November 1938
CP-1938-017
Summary of Report of Woodhead Commission on Palestine
Transcribed from the clipping
“The Royal Commission presided over by the late Earl Peel proposed a solution of the Palestinian problem by means of a scheme of partition… The report of the Palestine Partition Commission rejected the recommendations of the Royal Commission.”
Context added by this archive
The commission that undid Peel, printed whole alongside the text of the British policy statement. It concluded that partition as recommended was impracticable. Until this clipping the archive held nothing at all on Woodhead.
Cite this item
"Summary of Report of Woodhead Commission on Palestine," New York Times, 10 November 1938. Covering Palestine archive, CP-1938-017. https://coveringpalestine.org/archive/cp-1938-017
More from New York Times
- Earrings Dug Up in Palestine Believed by Petrie to Be IrishNew York Times · 14 May 1932
- Five Arabs Slain in PalestineNew York Times · 23 July 1932
- Arab Paper Banned in PalestineNew York Times · 17 November 1935
- ARAB OUTBREAKS GO ON IN PALESTINENew York Times · 26 April 1936
- Palestine Bars Arab PressNew York Times · 4 July 1936
- PALESTINIAN POPULATIONSNew York Times · 8 August 1936
- 56 more from this paper in the full text →
More from the 1930s
- Terrorism Continues in PalestineThe New York Times · 30 January 1938
- Zionist District To Meet TonightThe News · 21 February 1938
- Young Zionists Have SymposiumThe Daily Argus · 5 May 1938
- PALESTINE FACES NEW BLOODSHEDThe Buffalo News · 29 July 1938
- PALESTINE CURFEW LIFTED BY BRITAINThe Buffalo Times · 3 August 1938
- ARABS IN PALESTINE GREET WAR THREATNew York Times · 11 September 1938
- All 103 clippings from the 1930s →
This record is part of Covering Palestine, an archive of American and Anglophone newspaper clippings about Palestinians, 1799 to 2023. Researched and assembled by Maria Robles.
The clipping belongs to the newspaper that printed it, or to the news agency that supplied the copy. It is reproduced here for research, criticism and commentary. The city is derived from the masthead, not read off the clipping.
Something wrong here, or something you know about this clipping? The archive is still being built and corrections are wanted: maria@rozumstudio.com, quoting CP-1938-017.
Everything printed in 1938 · See it in the archive reel · Full text of every clipping · Dataset