New York Times · 2 September 1985
CP-1985-014
1,000 Protest Kahane's Views in Israeli Arab City
Transcribed from the clipping
“Some of the 1,000 Arabs and Jews who paraded Saturday through Umm al Fahm, Israel. The marchers were protesting the views of Rabbi Meir Kahane and discrimination against the country’s Arabs.”
Context added by this archive
Kahane had driven to Umm al-Fahm to urge its residents to leave Israel. A thousand people walked through the town against him, Arabs and Jews together, and the Times ran the photograph. Kahane’s party was barred from the next election; the position outlived him.
Cite this item
"1,000 Protest Kahane's Views in Israeli Arab City," New York Times, 2 September 1985. Covering Palestine archive, CP-1985-014. https://coveringpalestine.org/archive/cp-1985-014
More from New York Times
- Earrings Dug Up in Palestine Believed by Petrie to Be IrishNew York Times · 14 May 1932
- Five Arabs Slain in PalestineNew York Times · 23 July 1932
- Arab Paper Banned in PalestineNew York Times · 17 November 1935
- ARAB OUTBREAKS GO ON IN PALESTINENew York Times · 26 April 1936
- Palestine Bars Arab PressNew York Times · 4 July 1936
- PALESTINIAN POPULATIONSNew York Times · 8 August 1936
- 88 more from this paper in the full text →
More from the 1980s
- Northern Border Secured, Says Israeli EnvoyThe Arizona Republic · 3 February 1985
- U.S. says murdered Palestinian symbolizes peace dangersBroken Arrow Ledger · 20 March 1985
- PLO Propaganda Offensive Becomes Intense in ArgentinaSt. Louis Jewish Light · 17 April 1985
- Lebanese militia fighters exchange machine-gun fireTalahasee Democrat · 23 June 1985
- No Travel Permits to U.N. ConferenceTelegram & Gazette · 10 July 1985
- Kenyan resolution saves women’s conferenceTimes-News · 28 July 1985
- All 307 clippings from the 1980s →
This record is part of Covering Palestine, an archive of American and Anglophone newspaper clippings about Palestinians, 1799 to 2023. Researched and assembled by Maria Robles.
The clipping belongs to the newspaper that printed it, or to the news agency that supplied the copy. It is reproduced here for research, criticism and commentary. The city is derived from the masthead, not read off the clipping.
Something wrong here, or something you know about this clipping? The archive is still being built and corrections are wanted: maria@rozumstudio.com, quoting CP-1985-014.
Everything printed in 1985 · See it in the archive reel · Full text of every clipping · Dataset