Burlington Free Press · 3 March 1932
CP-1932-004
PALESTINE IS GOING MODERN

Transcribed from the clipping
By MARION RUBINSTEIN into Palestine without benefit of IT 1S the hope of Herzlia, which Palestine, one wonders what will HAIFA is the city of the future become of either passport or visa. becoming an entire the Old Palestine, in On official visits he seems very ten years from in Palestine. the pic- What Tel Aviv American colony. to make of its today, pliable, Wheedle means to Palestine casy to things turesqueness that Palestine's which now, Haifa sand dunes boulevard will be in ten out of, easy to promise.
But face will have disappeared. Physically will be flanked by trees and lit years. him on any matter Herzlia is it is more of state and attractive than Tel with powerful lights. America is the to which BUTE he is granite. the Aviv. It combines the beauty of say men who to Raanana what Brooklyn is to Palestine has turned its face.
And have dealt with him. both Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, it
How this text was made
Transcribed by optical character recognition and not read back by hand.
A correction
The deck paired this scan with the other caption on its slide. The masthead printed on the scan names this paper.
Cite this item
"PALESTINE IS GOING MODERN," Burlington Free Press, 3 March 1932. Covering Palestine archive, CP-1932-004. https://coveringpalestine.org/archive/cp-1932-004
More from the 1930s
- Palestine CustomsThe Utica Sun · 28 January 1932
- You Never Would Have Dreamt What Happened When They Started Taking Census in JerusalemStar Tribune · 13 March 1932
- Arabs Blamed for Recent TroublesBennington Evening Banner · 30 March 1932
- HEBREW BOTANIST STUDIES REMEDIESThe Flint Journal · 4 October 1932
- Progress in PalestineQuad City Times · 10 November 1932
- Palestine’s Labor ProblemThe Jewish Press · 9 January 1931
- All 64 clippings from the 1930s →
This record is part of Covering Palestine, an archive of American and Anglophone newspaper clippings about Palestinians, 1799 to 2023. Researched and assembled by Maria Robles.
The clipping belongs to the newspaper that printed it, or to the news agency that supplied the copy. It is reproduced here for research, criticism and commentary. The city is derived from the masthead, not read off the clipping.
Something wrong here, or something you know about this clipping? The archive is still being built and corrections are wanted: maria@rozumstudio.com, quoting CP-1932-004.
Everything printed in 1932 · See it in the archive reel · Full text of every clipping · Dataset