The New York Times · 2 May 1949
CP-1949-032
Arab-Israeli Fight Near Jerusalem Follows Withdrawal of the Legion
By GENE CURRIVAN, Special to The New York Times.

Transcribed from the clipping
TEL AVIV, Israel, May 1—An air-raid alert was sounded in Jerusalem tonight when local fighting between Israeli forces and Arabs broke out just below the city. The clash occurred after the Arab Legion had withdrawn to permit Israelis to take over a stretch along the railway, under the terms of the agreement signed at Rhodes between Israel and Jordan.
After the Legion had withdrawn, local Arabs in one section refused to be evacuated, and as a result there was a pitched battle. All details were barred by rigid censorship, but it was evident that the clash was more than a mere skirmish as the blasts and shooting were heard in Jerusalem.
Air alarms sounded throughout the city and the streets were cleared for more than three hours. A spokesman here said tonight that the engagement had been completed and that the Arabs had withdrawn, and that everything was back to normal. The agreement between Jordan and Israel was designed to clear certain Arab-held parts of the Lydda-Jerusalem railway. This has now been done.
The first explosions were heard at 7:40 P. M. May Day celebrations abruptly stopped, shops closed and everyone disappeared from the streets, just as they had done so many times before during the last year. Blackout curtains were brought out once again and everyone kept away from windows. But the blasts lasted only an hour and nothing happened after that.
Meanwhile, Egyptian troops were evacuating the territory that they held jointly with the Arab Legion and starting back to Egypt, in accordance with their agreement with the Israelis. It was at first thought that the Egyptians might have caused the explosions by blowing up stores too bulky to take with them.
They moved from the Bethlehem and Hebron districts through Israeli territory to Gaza without incident.
How this transcription was made
Transcribed from the slide scan by a reader working off magnified crops, not by optical character recognition. The newspaper is printed on the clipping in the credit line “Special to The New York Times.” beneath the byline. The clipping carries no masthead and no folio; the date is derived from the printed dateline, “TEL AVIV, Israel, May 1”, corroborated by the article’s own reference to May Day celebrations stopping that evening, and the year by the Rhodes armistice between Israel and Jordan and the Egyptian withdrawal, both of early 1949.
Cite this clipping
"Arab-Israeli Fight Near Jerusalem Follows Withdrawal of the Legion," The New York Times, 2 May 1949. Covering Palestine archive, CP-1949-032. https://coveringpalestine.org/archive/cp-1949-032
More from The New York Times
- The Maine Colony in PalestineThe New York Times · 12 November 1866
- Jewish Colonization in PalestineThe New York Times · 9 December 1883
- Jewish State in Palestine OpposedThe New York Times · 9 July 1897
- ZIONIST CONGRESS IN BASELThe New York Times · 31 August 1897
- ROME FEARS THE ZIONISTSThe New York Times · 12 September 1897
- PROGRESS OF ZIONISMThe New York Times · 16 December 1901
- 852 more from this paper in the full text →
More from the 1940s
- Palestinian Arabs In Distress, Hope For Speedy War EndAda Evening News · 11 January 1949
- Palestinian Arabs Hope For PeaceMcAlester News-Capital · 11 January 1949
- Palestinian Arabs, Embittered At War’s Course, Invites Abdullah To Act in Hope for Speedy PeaceSun Journal · 11 January 1949
- MODERN MADONNAThe Waukesha County Freeman · 12 January 1949
- Truman Gets British View On Critical Situation in PalestinePoughkeepsie Journal · 13 January 1949
- Israel Speeds Resettlement of Areas Left by the ArabsThe New York Times · 18 January 1949
- All 334 clippings from the 1940s →
Last updated 2 November 2026
This record is part of Covering Palestine, an archive of American newspaper clippings about Palestinians, 1724 to 2023. Researched and assembled by Maria Robles.
The clipping belongs to the newspaper that printed it, or to the news agency that supplied the copy. It is reproduced here for research, criticism and commentary. A city here is where the newspaper was published, not where the story came from, and on most records it was taken from the masthead.
Something wrong here, or something you know about this clipping? The archive is still being built and corrections are wanted: maria@rozumstudio.com, quoting CP-1949-032.
Everything printed in 1949 · Printed on this day · See it in the archive reel · Full text of every clipping · Dataset