The New York Times · 19 February 1965
CP-1965-006
After 17 Years, 30,000 Refugees Still Wait at Aqabat Jaber

Shown from the top. The whole column is in the enlargement.
Transcribed from the clipping
“After 17 Years, 30,000 Refugees Still Wait at Aqabat Jaber to Return to Palestine — By BROOKS ATKINSON”
Context added by this archive
Brooks Atkinson, the Times' former chief drama critic turned correspondent, in the largest refugee camp in the Jordan valley. The headline names the camp, the number, the years, and what they are waiting for.
Cite this item
"After 17 Years, 30,000 Refugees Still Wait at Aqabat Jaber," The New York Times, 19 February 1965. Covering Palestine archive, CP-1965-006. https://coveringpalestine.org/archive/cp-1965-006
More from The New York Times
- The Maine Colony in PalestineThe New York Times · 12 November 1866
- Jewish Colonization in PalestineThe New York Times · 9 December 1883
- Jewish State in Palestine OpposedThe New York Times · 9 July 1897
- ZIONIST CONGRESS IN BASELThe New York Times · 31 August 1897
- ROME FEARS THE ZIONISTSThe New York Times · 12 September 1897
- PROGRESS OF ZIONISMThe New York Times · 16 December 1901
- 401 more from this paper in the full text →
More from the 1960s
- Palestinian Arabs Reportedly Engaged in Sabotage CampaignLincoln Journal Star · 2 April 1965
- Mao Finds Issue And an AgitatorEvansville Press · 27 June 1965
- Hogs Live Better Than 1,500,000Omaha World-Herald · 26 September 1965
- Refugees Fare Poorly, Packed Into Gaza StripChicago Tribune · 27 September 1965
- Palestine RefugeesThe New York Times · 29 September 1965
- U.S. Palestine Plan Changed by U.N. UnitThe New York Times · 18 November 1965
- All 137 clippings from the 1960s →
This record is part of Covering Palestine, an archive of American and Anglophone newspaper clippings about Palestinians, 1799 to 2023. Researched and assembled by Maria Robles.
The clipping belongs to the newspaper that printed it, or to the news agency that supplied the copy. It is reproduced here for research, criticism and commentary. The city is derived from the masthead, not read off the clipping.
Something wrong here, or something you know about this clipping? The archive is still being built and corrections are wanted: maria@rozumstudio.com, quoting CP-1965-006.
Everything printed in 1965 · See it in the archive reel · Full text of every clipping · Dataset