Chicago Tribune · Chicago, IL · 1 August 2003
CP-2003-033
Wall adds security, builds enmity
Some sleeping easier, others see land grab at work
By Uli Schmetzer, Special to the Tribune

Transcribed from the clipping
UM AL-FAHM, Israel — The day soldiers put down the stakes for the new Israeli security barrier on the hill behind his house, Ahmed Yussef Jabarin realized he was about to be zoned out of Israel and into the West Bank. Jabarin, 67, a farmer, is one of Israel’s 1.3 million Arab citizens. Like most Israeli Arabs, he grumbles about being treated like a second-class Israeli.
But he had no intention of joining his fellow Palestinians on their side of the controversial new divide, a wall and fence already snaking 90 miles down the northern part of the West Bank. The barrier has drawn fierce criticism because much of it is to be built inside the West Bank, creating a new de facto border that carves away Palestinian territory.
In Jabarin’s case, however, the opposite was proposed. Planners were willing to give up Israeli territory to locate the fence on the hill, providing a better vantage point. “Listen, I’m an Israeli,” he said. “Why should they kick me out? Because I’m an Arab they tried to make me into a Palestinian. It would have killed me. There is no work, no money over there.”
So he protested. His cousin Rafiq Jabarin, a lawyer, took up the case. The municipality of Um Al-Fahm, a town of 37,000 Israeli Arabs on the Green Line dividing Israel and the West Bank, joined in the protest, enraged by the prospect of losing 3 million square feet of land to the Palestinian side if the fence had run its planned course.
How this transcription was made
Date confirmed on the page (folio-verified for the date, byline-consistent for the paper (the section folio reads “WORLD” at the left and “FRIDAY AUGUST 1, 2003” at the right; 1 August 2003 was a Friday. The ). Adjudicated confirmed against the printed page: Section folio across the top: 'WORLD' at the left, 'FRIDAY AUGUST 1, 2003' at the right. 1 August 2003 was a Friday. The paper's own name is NOT in the folio; what is printed is the byline 'By Uli Sch.
Context added by this archive
The Tribune also prints, in its own voice, “Palestinians dub the new West Bank barrier the ‘Wall of Shame’ or the ‘Apartheid Wall.’ Israelis call it a ‘security fence.’” — an explicit, symmetrical statement that the two sides have different names for the same object, printed on a page whose own people-naming is anything but symmetrical.
Cite this clipping
"Wall adds security, builds enmity," Chicago Tribune, 1 August 2003. Covering Palestine archive, CP-2003-033. https://coveringpalestine.org/archive/cp-2003-033
More from Chicago Tribune
- FINDS the ROCK MOSES STRUCKChicago Tribune · 26 May 1901
- Chief Issue in ZionChicago Tribune · 16 August 1907
- Palestine and PatriotismChicago Tribune · 9 January 1916
- Move Palestine Arabs To Iraq, Hoover UrgesChicago Tribune · 20 November 1945
- Manhunt Is On For Palestine Jail FugitivesChicago Tribune · 6 May 1947
- CRISIS NEARS CLIMAXChicago Tribune · 9 February 1948
- 39 more from this paper in the full text →
More from the 2000s
- Unfortunately, It Was ParadiseSan Francisco Chronicle · 19 January 2003
- 62 Palestinian shops destroyedColumbia Missourian · 22 January 2003
- Israeli forces kill two PalestiniansThe Charlotte Observer · 30 January 2003
- A Palestinian boy holds a bomb used by Israeli soldiers as he stands in the rubble of his family home Monday in Jabalia in GazaThe Gazette · 1 February 2003
- Some Israelis contemplate low-grade ‘genocide’ for PalestiniansThe Free Lance-Star · 2 February 2003
- Two Palestinian farmers killed by Israeli fireIndex-Journal · 4 February 2003
- All 516 clippings from the 2000s →
Last updated 2 November 2026
This record is part of Covering Palestine, an archive of American newspaper clippings about Palestinians, 1724 to 2023. Researched and assembled by Maria Robles.
The clipping belongs to the newspaper that printed it, or to the news agency that supplied the copy. It is reproduced here for research, criticism and commentary. A city here is where the newspaper was published, not where the story came from, and on most records it was taken from the masthead.
Something wrong here, or something you know about this clipping? The archive is still being built and corrections are wanted: maria@rozumstudio.com, quoting CP-2003-033.
Everything printed in 2003 · Printed on this day · See it in the archive reel · Full text of every clipping · Dataset