Evening Star · Washington, District of Columbia · 23 April 1957
CP-1957-019
U. N. Protection Due Both Sides in Gaza
On the Record

Transcribed from the clipping
“The conflict that arose recently between Joseph Alsop, Herald Tribune columnist, writing from Gaza, and the United Nations, which has questioned his accuracy, does not seem to involve much of factual substance… And it is not only necessary to protect Israel from Arab raiders but to protect the border Arab communities from Israelis, who in the raids and counter-raids of the last eight years have killed far more Arabs than Arabs have killed Israelis.
This a matter of record. The U. N. (publicly confirmed by the Israeli delegate, Abba Eban) has reported that raids into Israel during the whole period since the 1949 armistice have resulted in 443 Israeli deaths. On Arab casualties no figures are available for the whole period. But precise U. N. figures are obtainable from January 1, 1955, through September 30, 1956.
During this critical 21 months, prior to the attack on Sinai and Gaza, 496 Arabs, military and civilians, were killed, compared with 121 Israelis, the number of Arab deaths in less than two years thus exceeding by 53 the sum total of Israeli deaths in the whole period since the armistice.
There is also available a special report by the director of the UNRWA in the Near East, covering November 1, 1956 to mid-December, the first 45 days of Israeli occupation of Gaza, during which 452 Arabs are known by ‘trustworthy sources’ to have been killed. These were not casualties of fighting between Israeli and Egyptian troops, which lasted only a few hours.
The report is specific and detailed as to places and persons. The UNRWA director (Mr. Labouisse) in his past year’s report estimates that five Arabs have been killed for every Israeli in the frontier clashes. So if the U. N. has failed to protect Israelis under past arrangements, it has failed to an even greater extent to protect Arabs.
As far as Gaza is concerned, protection for both is its mission.”
Context added by this archive
A syndicated columnist doing the arithmetic in 1957, with United Nations figures and the Israeli delegate’s confirmation attached to them: four hundred and ninety-six Arabs against a hundred and twenty-one Israelis in twenty-one months, and four hundred and fifty-two Arabs killed in the first forty-five days of what she calls the Israeli occupation of Gaza.
The subheadings are “Israel Rejects Patrols” and “Israelis Inflict Most Deaths.”
Cite this clipping
"U. N. Protection Due Both Sides in Gaza," Evening Star, 23 April 1957, p. 1. Covering Palestine archive, CP-1957-019. https://coveringpalestine.org/archive/cp-1957-019
More from Evening Star
- Going to PalestineEvening Star · 7 April 1907
- Hits Zionist Policy.Evening Star · 26 May 1927
- JEWS ARE TURNING PALESTINE INTO MODERN CIVILIZED STATEEvening Star · 5 June 1927
- Palestine Policy Assailed by JewsEvening Star · 21 October 1930
- Arab Strike Protests Jewish Town ArmoriesEvening Star · 24 August 1931
- British Policy Now Forces It to Help Arabs Ousted From Palestine FarmsEvening Star · 14 January 1934
- 37 more from this paper in the full text →
More from the 1950s
- Rear Attack By Israeli Clears Gaza TerritoryEscanaba Daily Press · 1957
- Troops Remain Along Gaza Strip And Aqaba GulfSolano Napa News Chronicle · 3 February 1957
- UN Praises Gaza HospitalOklahoma City Star · 8 February 1957
- Riots Feared if Israelis Leave Gaza SuddenlyEvening Star · 17 February 1957
- Palestinian Arabs Clash With PoliceTelegram & Gazette · 26 February 1957
- Mid-East Problems Panel Set TonightHigh Point Enterprise · 27 February 1957
- All 215 clippings from the 1950s →
In these collections
Last updated 2 November 2026
This record is part of Covering Palestine, an archive of American newspaper clippings about Palestinians, 1724 to 2023. Researched and assembled by Maria Robles.
The clipping belongs to the newspaper that printed it, or to the news agency that supplied the copy. It is reproduced here for research, criticism and commentary. A city here is where the newspaper was published, not where the story came from, and on most records it was taken from the masthead.
Something wrong here, or something you know about this clipping? The archive is still being built and corrections are wanted: maria@rozumstudio.com, quoting CP-1957-019.
Everything printed in 1957 · Printed on this day · See it in the archive reel · Full text of every clipping · Dataset