The New York Times · 22 June 1969
CP-1969-021
ISRAELIS SEIZING WEST-BANK AREA
Arabs Protest Security Step at Village Near Hebron
By JAMES FERON

Shown from the top. The whole column — 4.9 times taller than it is wide — is in the enlargement.
Transcribed from the clipping
JERUSALEM, June 21 — The Israeli authorities have requisitioned 300 acres of Arab-owned land near Kfar Etzion, an Israeli settlement in the occupied West Bank area, and have given about 100 people living there a week to leave.
The order, issued last Monday, has caused dismay in the Hebron region and confirmed some Arab fears that the Israelis are embarked on an expansion of the Etzion settlement or on building a new one. The mayor of Hebron, Sheik Mohammed Ali Jaabari, said he had sent a message to Mrs. Golda Meir, the Israeli Premier, begging her to rescind the order.
Arab notables met with military government authorities seeking its cancellation, but the response was apparently negative. Some observers believe that the Israelis may use the land to establish a nahal, or paramilitary settlement, largely as protection for the Etzion settlers.
They have not been attacked, but a military source said that there has been an increasing number of sabotage and terrorist incidents in the northern Hebron region. He said the requisitioned land was needed for security. Government officials suggested that an army base would be established there but that it would not be a nahal.
Israeli and Arab sources agree that the land is Arab-owned. Sheik Jaabari said it had been in Arab hands for centuries. An Israeli source said that most of the houses belonged to residents of the nearby village of Irtech and that they had others in the village itself. He added that the Arab owners were being compensated.
Kfar Etzion was established shortly after the Israeli victory in the six-day 1967 war on one of the sites of four settlements overrun by Jordanian forces in the 1948 war. The settlements, known as the Etzion Bloc, were destroyed by the Jordanians, and many inhabitants were slaughtered.
In 1967 the Israeli Government came under strong pressure to permit settlers, including children of the original Etzion Bloc farmers, to return to the area. Bowing to strong pressure, the Government, under the late Premier Levi Eshkol, permitted the re-establishment of the Etzion name in the region.
The move caused furor in the Arab world, where fears of Israeli territorial expansion were seemingly confirmed. Israelis who opposed acquisition of territories taken in the six-day war also objected.
Cite this clipping
"ISRAELIS SEIZING WEST-BANK AREA," The New York Times, 22 June 1969. Covering Palestine archive, CP-1969-021. https://coveringpalestine.org/archive/cp-1969-021
More from The New York Times
- The Maine Colony in PalestineThe New York Times · 12 November 1866
- Jewish Colonization in PalestineThe New York Times · 9 December 1883
- Jewish State in Palestine OpposedThe New York Times · 9 July 1897
- ZIONIST CONGRESS IN BASELThe New York Times · 31 August 1897
- ROME FEARS THE ZIONISTSThe New York Times · 12 September 1897
- PROGRESS OF ZIONISMThe New York Times · 16 December 1901
- 852 more from this paper in the full text →
More from the 1960s
- Israel Integrating Druze AreasThe Plain Dealer · 1969
- Arabs Create 'Schools of Hate' for YoungSan Francisco Examiner · 12 January 1969
- Arab textbooks carry message of hatredAlbany Democrat-Herald · 22 January 1969
- Dayan Tours Four Towns in West-Bank RegionThe New York Times · 12 February 1969
- Israelis Slaughter Palestine ArabsFlorida Today · 13 February 1969
- Another View On Justice, TruthWorcester Telegram · 19 February 1969
- All 227 clippings from the 1960s →
Last updated 2 November 2026
This record is part of Covering Palestine, an archive of American newspaper clippings about Palestinians, 1724 to 2023. Researched and assembled by Maria Robles.
The clipping belongs to the newspaper that printed it, or to the news agency that supplied the copy. It is reproduced here for research, criticism and commentary. A city here is where the newspaper was published, not where the story came from, and on most records it was taken from the masthead.
Something wrong here, or something you know about this clipping? The archive is still being built and corrections are wanted: maria@rozumstudio.com, quoting CP-1969-021.
Everything printed in 1969 · Printed on this day · See it in the archive reel · Full text of every clipping · Dataset