The News Journal · Wilmington, Delaware · 27 October 1930
CP-1930-004
Racial Controversy in Palestine
(From the Baltimore Sun.)
Transcribed from the clipping
“…the Zionists are naturally unwilling to be reminded that, after all, the Arabs have enjoyed possession in Palestine since the seventh century… the League of Nations mandate makes Britain as responsible for one racial group in Palestine as for another.”
Context added by this archive
The identical editorial to the Baltimore Sun’s of five days earlier, credited and reprinted. The Sun ran it under the single word PALESTINE; Wilmington boxed it and headlined it Racial Controversy in Palestine. The archive has very few cases where the same body copy can be set beside two headlines with everything else held constant.
Cite this item
"Racial Controversy in Palestine," The News Journal, 27 October 1930. Covering Palestine archive, CP-1930-004. https://coveringpalestine.org/archive/cp-1930-004
More from The News Journal
- Glory Of Ancient Palestine May Be Restored By JewsThe News Journal · 13 March 1927
- Jewish Reprisal Raids On Two Arab Villages Take Toll of 8 LivesThe News Journal · 1 January 1948
- Bush team plans different Mideast tackThe News Journal · 8 February 2001
- Less than 1% of Israel army probes yield prosecutionThe News Journal · 25 December 2022
More from the 1930s
- For Peace In PalestineThe Cincinnati Enquirer · 26 January 1930
- FUTURE OF PALESTINE.The Des Moines Register · 7 June 1930
- Palestine Policy Assailed by JewsEvening Star · 21 October 1930
- PALESTINEThe Baltimore Sun · 22 October 1930
- Palestine’s Labor ProblemThe Jewish Press · 9 January 1931
- Money Printed in 3 LanguagesBrooklyn Eagle · 18 January 1931
- All 54 clippings from the 1930s →
This record is part of Covering Palestine, an archive of American and Anglophone newspaper clippings about Palestinians, 1799 to 2023. Researched and assembled by Maria Robles.
The clipping belongs to the newspaper that printed it, or to the news agency that supplied the copy. It is reproduced here for research, criticism and commentary. The city is derived from the masthead, not read off the clipping.
Something wrong here, or something you know about this clipping? The archive is still being built and corrections are wanted: maria@rozumstudio.com, quoting CP-1930-004.
See it in the archive reel · Full text of every clipping · Dataset