Wisconsin State Journal · Madison, Wisconsin · 16 May 2008
CP-2008-002
Remembering the Nakba on Israel’s 60th anniversary
Guest column
Judith Laitman and Tsela Barr

Transcribed from the clipping
"This month, Jews around the world are celebrating the 60th anniversary of the founding of the state of Israel. These celebrations reflect the understandable joy of Jews who view Israel as the symbol of 60 years of freedom from centuries of persecution, culminating in the Holocaust. Nevertheless, we are Jews who will not be celebrating. While Israel provided a safe haven for many Jews, the terrible fact is that more than 700,000 Palestinians were made into refugees to make room for the future state of Israel. Sixty years later, that number has swelled to an estimated 7 million... That is why the creation of the state of Israel is known as the Nakba, or the Catastrophe to Palestinians."
Context added by this archive
Jewish dissent, in a Wisconsin daily, eighty-six years after the New York Times cluster. The headline uses the word without quotation marks.
Cite this item
"Remembering the Nakba on Israel’s 60th anniversary," Wisconsin State Journal, 16 May 2008. Covering Palestine archive, CP-2008-002. https://coveringpalestine.org/archive/cp-2008-002
Elsewhere in the archive
- Palestinians mourn Israel’s anniversary as the ‘Nakba’The Day · 16 May 2008 · the same dispatch, carried by another paper
- Palestinian women hopeful self-rule will bring greater freedom for themWisconsin State Journal · 7 December 1993 · the same newspaper
- Four Arabs die in blast; 3 slain in GazaWisconsin State Journal · 7 December 1993 · the same newspaper
- Israel-Palestinian coverage is a matter of perceptionThe Miami Herald · 18 May 2008 · the same year
- Israel rejects calls for a truceThe York Dispatch · 31 December 2008 · the same year
This record is part of Covering Palestine, an archive of American and Anglophone newspaper clippings about Palestinians, 1812 to 2022. Researched and assembled by Maria Robles.
The clipping belongs to the newspaper that printed it, or to the wire service that supplied the copy. It is reproduced here for research, criticism and commentary. The city is derived from the masthead, not read off the clipping.
Something wrong here, or something you know about this clipping? The archive is still being built and corrections are wanted: maria@rozumstudio.com, quoting CP-2008-002.
See it in the archive reel · Full text of every clipping · Dataset