Sarasota Herald-Tribune · Sarasota, Florida · 6 June 1977
CP-1977-012
Israeli Expansion Could Prove Too Costly
JUDEA AND SAMARIA?
George F. Will, Washington

Transcribed from the clipping
“His has been an insistent voice proclaiming Israel’s right to Judea and Samaria—the ‘West Bank’ seized by Jordan in 1948… Israel can not seem to be hearing mysterious voices and obeying strange impulses. It must express its claims to legitimacy in the West’s shared vocabulary of liberal democratic politics.”
Context added by this archive
The same syndicated column as the Newsday printing, the same Monday. Newsday headlined it as Israel’s right being fragile; this paper headlined it as expansion being costly, and put the contested name in a kicker with a question mark after it. This printing is also the longer of the two and keeps sentences Newsday cut.
Cite this item
"Israeli Expansion Could Prove Too Costly," Sarasota Herald-Tribune, 6 June 1977. Covering Palestine archive, CP-1977-012. https://coveringpalestine.org/archive/cp-1977-012
More from Sarasota Herald-Tribune
- ARABS RECOGNIZE ARABSSarasota Herald-Tribune · 14 October 1948
- No Compromise At Kiryat ArbaSarasota Herald-Tribune · 12 February 1980
- Peres: Declaration of Palestinian state could start talksSarasota Herald-Tribune · 10 November 2001
- The port city of JaffaSarasota Herald-Tribune · 9 September 2018
More from the 1970s
- Under friendly exterior—an ex-terroristChicago Tribune · 18 May 1977
- The PalestiniansThe Miami Herald · 29 May 1977
- The Fragile Right to Be IsraelNewsday · 6 June 1977
- Israel, PLO In TouchThe News and Advance · 6 June 1977
- West Bank Belongs To Jewish HomelandThe News and Advance · 6 June 1977
- Show of Artists from PalestineLos Angeles Times · 24 June 1977
- All 102 clippings from the 1970s →
This record is part of Covering Palestine, an archive of American and Anglophone newspaper clippings about Palestinians, 1799 to 2023. Researched and assembled by Maria Robles.
The clipping belongs to the newspaper that printed it, or to the news agency that supplied the copy. It is reproduced here for research, criticism and commentary. The city is derived from the masthead, not read off the clipping.
Something wrong here, or something you know about this clipping? The archive is still being built and corrections are wanted: maria@rozumstudio.com, quoting CP-1977-012.
See it in the archive reel · Full text of every clipping · Dataset